Business Litigation  Equipment Leases 

Los Angeles Equipment Lease Lawyer

At the Law Office of Steven R. Lovett, we represent lessors and lessees involved in equipment lease disputes or transactions. Since 1978, we have combined our knowledge and skills with our business clients' insight into their unique legal situation and needs.

If you are involved in an equipment lease dispute or you have questions regarding an equipment lease, do not hesitate to Contact us by e-mail or call Southern California equipment lease attorney Steven R. Lovett.

What Law Governs California Equipment Leases?

Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code governs all leases made or effective after January 1, 1990. In California, the California Commercial Code (hereinafter "CC") now governs all equipment leases after January 1, 1990. California's statutes follow the UCC, but the numbering is slightly different since the sections appear in Division 10 of the Code. For example, 2A-507 is 10507, 2A-508 is 10508, etc.

Electing Remedies

The parties do not have to strictly follow the remedies in Article 2A. Subsection 6 of CC
10523 allows the lessor to opt out of the remedies section of Article 2A, and elect their own
remedies. Accordingly, most sections begin with the language, "except as otherwise provided..."

Recovering Damages Instead of Repossession

CC 10523 and 10528(a) also make it clear that the lessor need not repossess, unless the lessee tenders the equipment. Subsection (b) provides that if the lessor does not exercise a right or obtain a remedy to which it is entitled, it may recover damages calculated "in any reasonable manner," together with incidental damages (lost profits), less expenses saved. Also, acceleration of the lease balance, discounted to present value, is sanctioned by CC 10528, whether or not there is a repossession.

CC 10527 discusses the lessor's remedies when the equipment is released by a substantially similar lease. This is a rather rare scenario, so I will not spend any time on this section.

Releasing by Dissimilar Lease, Resale, and Election to Retain Goods

CC 10528 corresponds to 2A-528. This section governs releasing by a dissimilar lease, and two more common situations:

  • Resale of the equipment; the lessor could dispose of the goods but decides not to (the "if a lessor elects to retain the goods" language in subsection (a))

In either of these situations, which are the two most common lease default scenarios, the lessor has the following remedy:

  • The lessor can collect "accrued and unpaid rent" as of the date of repossession or default (if there is no repossession); plus the present value of the "total rent for the then remaining lease term of the original lease agreement minus the present value as of the same date of the market rent at the place where the goods are located..." (this means accelerated rent reduced to present value); plus any incidental damages (lost profits), less expenses saved.

Finally, under Article 2A, while the lessor need not repossess, if the lessor does repossess, it must credit the lessee with sums collected pursuant to CC 10529. (Believe it or not, this provision has been added to California's version of 2A, and this duty to credit the resold equipment is not found in all jurisdictions).

Learn more about how we can help you with your equipment lease case. Contact us by e-mail or call us for a free telephonic consultation.

Client Testimonials
  • “Lovett got it right away and was spot-on. He got right to the point and encouraged me not to go off on tangents. He managed me well throughout a difficult case. Lovett was fair/reasonable in the fees ...”

    - Dr. Pamela Morton
  • “Steve Lovett has been our go to business attorney since 1980. That in itself says a lot about how we feel regarding his guidance and consistently strong service. When we call for advice he usually ...”

    - Richard B. Lehman, CID, EnvironeticsĀ®
  • “I had a very positive experience with Steven Lovett. He took the extra step to resolve the issues I had and, in a shorter than anticipated time; my ordeal was over. I would highly recommend him to any ...”

    - J. Timbol, William's Paving
  • “Mr. Lovett has been my counsel for over ten years. He has been representing and consulting my firm in construction and real estate matters and me. During that time Mr. Lovett has successfully ...”

    - Rafi Sharon, Globe Remodeling Inc.
  • “I have only the highest praise for the work of my attorney, Steven R. Lovett. He represented me in a very difficult case, most professionally, and won it in record time. He was always very ...”

    - Carol L. (reviewed on Google)
/